The Human Microchipping Agenda

The Human Microchipping Agenda

People are living very busy lives these days, working extra hard to keep the roofs over their heads, the food on their tables. Those are the lucky ones, or so are led to believe. Life in this particular dog-eat-dog system can be stressful. We've been trained by behavioral experts to live our lives as expendable cause, upholding a cruel and vindictive machine, all for the benefit of a dominant minority of ruthless, elitist criminals, at or near the top of the pyramid.
There are powerful psychopaths who can engineer world wars or bring down entire economies whenever their global business plan requires it... and they do. This anti-human system we collectively chose to maintain focuses on the perpetual need for money, so as to avoid becoming homeless and destitute, rather than working for humanity and focusing on the ability of human beings stored together for the benefit of all, great or small. And also tolerates George Orwell's "doublethink", where by liars and criminals the governments can hide the public opinion and keep secrets for the sake of "national security"... apparently.
Or making outrages claims about openness and honesty and padding themselves on the back for the wonderful service they're doing to humanity by exporting democracy to the Middle East. And we haven't seen anything yet. The new world order that we see unfolding used to be merely handed out by the various strategically positioned front men and women. Nowadays it is discussed semi-openly by today's front people and can no longer be ignored by the human beings who happen to be alive today.

Those new front people utilize new technology as it been made available to the general public. They have us all numbered and they want us to believe that it's for our own good. That way we can all be monitored more easily and believe that it's for our own safety.

The Gatekeepers (2012)

the gatekeepers (2012)

A documentary featuring interviews with all surviving former heads of Shin Bet, the Israeli security agency whose activities and membership are closely held state secrets.

Namibia Genocide And The Second Reich

Between 1904 and 1907, Germany has committed his first genocide in
Namibia and has explicitly planned the extermination of two people : the
Namas and the Hereros. Two-thirds of the Herero people and the half of
the Nama people of the German colony were killed, many in concentration
camps.

Today, the descendants of the survivors are seeking reparations from
the German government. An groundbreaking documentary on the origins of

the Holocaust in Germany’s colonial Policy.

Paris Terror Suspect Amedy Coulibaly Met With French President Sarkozy in 2009

All the details I mentioned in the Paris 9/11 story that are consonant with false flags have now emerged.  The siege ending in a standoff with reported hostages has the tell-tale signs of a false flag event.  In fact, Amedi Coulibaby, one suspect, met with Sarkozy in 2009 as the below article shows.  On top of that, Pentagon-dining guest and CIA asset Anwar al-Awlaki was also affiliated with the Kouachi suspects, sending funding according to reports. The story sounds like a Takenfilm, but I guess Liam Neeson was too busy filming part 17 to save the day.  Aren’t the people the terrorists consort with relevant?

Here is a translation and news tip courtesy of Dutchsinse via Facebook:

an unlikely encounter between Nicolas Sarkozy, the then French President and Amedy Coulibaly, the gunman suspected of killing a police woman and of taking five hostages at a kosher grocery in eastern Paris today.

The meeting took place in 2009 in the Élysée Palace when Mr Sarkozy met nine young French men who got just jobs in a local factory. They were all from Grigny, a tough Parisian suburb torn by riots 10 years ago.

Quoting the “terrorist”:

“Sarkozy is not truly popular with the youth in the estates. But that is nothing personal. In fact it is the case for most politicians,” said Coulibaly.

“The encounter really impressed me. Whether I like him or not, he is the president after all.”

In my mind, the story brings back memories of the scandal involving Dominique Strauss-Kahn, and likely has to do with Anglo power axis not liking the potential pivot of France toward Palestine and Russia.  However, I wouldn’t place much hope in a Grand Orient Hollande move toward Palestine, with the UN playing a massive role in the Palestine issue.  Meanwhile, the US has been aiding and training these Jihadis, not since Obama’s regime, but, as you recall, back to Brzezinski and Robert Gates.  And before that, British Intelligence did it for a hundred years prior.

READ MORE.... 

Monsanto’s Roundup Overuse: Scientist Warns Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025

Why? Evidence points to glyphosate toxicity from the overuse of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide on our food.

For over three decades, Stephanie Seneff, PhD, has researched biology and technology, over the years publishing over 170 scholarly peer-reviewed articles. In recent years she has concentrated on the relationship between nutrition and health, tackling such topics as Alzheimer’s, autism, and cardiovascular diseases, as well as the impact of nutritional deficiencies and environmental toxins on human health.

At a conference last Thursday, in a special panel discussion about GMOs, she took the audience by surprise when she declared, “At today’s rate, by 2025, one in two children will be autistic.”She noted that the side effects of autism closely mimic those of glyphosate toxicity, and presented data showing a remarkably consistent correlation between the use of Roundup on crops (and the creation of Roundup-ready GMO crop seeds) with rising rates of autism. Children with autism have biomarkers indicative of excessive glyphosate, including zinc and iron deficiency, low serum sulfate, seizures, and mitochondrial disorder.

A fellow panelist reported that after Dr. Seneff’s presentation, “All of the 70 or so people in attendance were squirming, likely because they now had serious misgivings about serving their kids, or themselves, anything with corn or soy, which are nearly all genetically modified and thus tainted with Roundup and its glyphosate.”

Dr. Seneff noted the ubiquity of glyphosate’s use. Because it is used on corn and soy, all soft drinks and candies sweetened with corn syrup and all chips and cereals that contain soy fillers have small amounts of glyphosate in them, as do our beef and poultry since cattle and chicken are fed GMO corn or soy. Wheat is often sprayed with Roundup just prior to being harvested, which means that all non-organic bread and wheat products would also be sources of glyphosate toxicity. The amount of glyphosate in each product may not be large, but the cumulative effect (especially with as much processed food as Americans eat) could be devastating. A recent studyshows that pregnant women living near farms where pesticides are applied have a 60% increased risk of children having an autism spectrum disorder.

 

 

READ MORE..... 

The Attacks on Charlie Hebdo and the “Kosher Grocery Store”: Israel’s Mossad “to the Rescue”?

According to reports, French police have launched raids “on two separate sieges”  at a kosher grocery in a Jewish neighbourhood in Paris and at Dammartin en Goële, a small town 30 km. northeast of Paris “where the Charlie Hebdo suspects have reportedly been killed” (Daily Telegraph, January 9, 2015).  

Israel to the Rescue of the Kosher Grocery Store in Vincennes

Unconfirmed reports suggest that there were up to 10 hostages inside the kosher grocery.

Hours before the Jewish Sabbath, the street is usually especially crowded with shoppers – French Jews and tourists alike.

The Vincennes region of eastern Paris in which the second, grocery hostage situation is taking place has a large Jewish population. (Daily Telegraph, January 9, 2015)

Because the Jewish community is allegedly threatened, Israel is to come to the rescue of the kosher grocery store.

Prime minister Netanyahu has confirmed the dispatch of  an Israeli Police SWAT team unit which will be working in liaison with its French counterparts.  The Israeli  SWAT unit “specialising in siege situations and rescues is on standby ready to travel to Paris to assist the French authorities resolve the siege of the kosher grocery store.” according to Haaretz (emphasis added).

It should be noted that the entire French police apparatus is mobilized.  What would be the role of the Israeli police forces? Political propaganda? Bear in mind: president Francois Hollande is scheduled to make a major political statement in the wake of the police operation.

Foreknowledge of  the Charlie Hebdo Attack?

The suspects were known to French intelligence.

READ MORE....

PSYOPs Used Daily to Manipulate You - Covert Hypnosis, Mind Control Techniques - Wake Up and Protect Your Mind from Bondage

The average American is oblivious to the fact that since Sigmund Freud's groundbreaking discoveries about the human psyche, modern governments and corporations have been engaged in heightened psychological warfare and PSYOPs to take control of your mind and create the culture of sheeple we now live in.

This has been quite a feat, given the rugged individualism that was the hallmark of early America. But it is obviously working.

 

Americans are largely sheeple, cooperatively allowing the mass media, government propaganda and corporate marketing machines to determine what is right, true and fashionable.

The only defense is education. If you are not aware of the covert processes used to infiltrate your subconscious mind, then you are much more likely to fall prey to them.

Were you aware that US government operatives know how to use hypnosis to induce trance, provoke an average person to commit murder, then forget that it happened? This process has been documented as part of the government's effort to create a real Jason Bourne-like operative.

 

Of course, experiments were secretly forced upon healthy yet vulnerable citizens and mental hospital patients, but that is another story.

The point is, covert manipulation techniques DO NOT work on everyone. On whom do the methods fail?

 

On informed skeptics who are grounded in the present!
 

 

 

Herein lies your protection

If your mind is CLOSED to manipulation, then you are safe

How do you close your mind to manipulation and learn to be skeptical? You need to become aware of the tactics being used against you. Once you understand the magician's secret, the magic disappears.

Beware of these kinds of tactics:
 

False flags
False flags are staged events where the perpetrator is concealed and another party blamed.

This is useful for governments to convince their people to support war, give up freedoms, or to induce fear for any purpose. It is also useful for general demoralizing.

Hitler used a false flag event to sway the German people to support an invasion of Poland.

 

Shock and awe
This is the method of displaying overwhelming force or impressive technology to intimidate or demoralize an enemy.

On a large scale, the US invasion of Iraq under George W. Bush qualified. On a small scale, an NFL football team or boxer may make a grand entrance to the contest to show the opponent up.

When a government puts its power on display, it is saying "We cannot be defeated." When a corporation shows its massive resources or technological savvy, it says, "We are the best choice."

Displays of power or technology, however, are nothing more than that - displays. Such displays are so often smoke and mirror routines that are not backed by reality.
 

Hypnotic language
When people speak to you, do you ever question just what they are saying specifically?

Consider the following statements:

We must defend ourselves against all evil.
I want you to prosper.
We will always endeavor to do the right thing.

All of the above statements share the following quality - they DO NOT MEAN ANYTHING, specifically.

Let's take the first example above and see how many holes we can poke in it.

'We must defend ourselves against all evil.'

1. Who is "we"?
    
2. Must? What would happen if we didn't defend ourselves in this case? Whose problem is and can anything effectively be done?
    
3. How shall we defend ourselves? What does this mean that we will do, specifically, and at what cost? Who/What else will our defensive actions affect?
    
4. Defend ourselves against whom, specifically? I don't know anyone named "Evil."
    
5. All evil? Every evil that has ever existed?

We need to learn to think and question!
 

False accreditation
To sway people emotionally, fake associations are made.

"Four out of five dentists surveyed...."

Who are these dentists? Do any of them come forward? Never!

Government and corporate manipulators routinely create false surveys and false accrediting bodies specifically for the purpose of endorsing their propaganda.

This is how bacon and eggs became the national breakfast. It is also how fluoride got into our drinking water.
 

Fear
Fear can be induced as a trance state. Imagine being alone with a group of small children.

"Wait!" you whisper. "I hear someone outside."

You look out the window and allow an expression of horror to come over your face.

"Oh my gosh, there is a robber out there who wants to come in!"

Imagine the fear that will grip those children.

At that point, they will do anything you tell them that they believe will them safe. They are in a trance of fear. They do not fear the real robber. There is no real robber.

They fear the robber in their mind, based on your covert hypnotic induction.

 

 

Using the above tactics together for a complete operation to gain control of your mind

A combination of techniques are used that might look something like this:

1. Stage a horrifying false flag operation, such as a mass shooting or explosion of some sort.
    
2. This induces FEAR, which you play up through the media.
    
3. When in a fear trance, use vague, hypnotic language to manipulate people.

"We must take appropriate measures to protect our population so that this never happens again." (This sentence means NOTHING, specifically. The real meaning is simply not conveyed.)

4. Use false accreditation to endorse whatever new legislation or product you want to sell to your new, scared group of sheeple.

Open your eyes and ears and discover how these techniques and others are being used every single day to gain control of your mind and behavior.

New Studies say ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Sane - Government Dupes Crazy and Hostile

 

 Recent studies by psychologists

and social scientists in the US and UK

suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes,

those labeled "conspiracy theorists"

appear to be saner than those

who accept the official versions of contested events.

 

 

 

The most recent study was published on July 8^th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK).

 

Entitled "What About Building 7? A Social Psychological Study of Online Discussion of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories," the study compared "conspiracist" (pro-conspiracy theory) and "conventionalist" (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones:

"Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist."

In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one.

 

That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility:

"The research… showed that people who favored the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals."

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well.

 

According to them, their own theory of 9/11 - a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan - was indisputably true.

 

The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11:

"For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account."

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist - a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory - accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists.

 

It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called "conspiracists" or "conspiracy theorists."

Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press.

 

Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called "conspiracy theorists": The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination!

"The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time."

In other words, people who use the terms "conspiracy theory" and "conspiracy theorist" as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination.

 

That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.

DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved "state crimes against democracy."

 

An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the "Kennedy assassinations" in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.

Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed "conspiracy theory" label impedes cognitive function.

 

She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.

In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong "confirmation bias" - that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the "conspiracy theory" label) to avoid conflicting information.

The extreme irrationality of those who attack "conspiracy theories" has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University.

 

In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled "Dangerous Machinery - 'Conspiracy Theorist' as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion," they wrote:

"If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid…

By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur."

But now, thanks to the Internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the "conspiracy theory" smear is nearly worn-out.

 

In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous - and more rational - than anti-conspiracy ones.

No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.

Bravely Facing the Awful Truth

 

The real full on Truth hits you hard. Right in the heart.

Your family is at stake, humanity is at stake. We’re being relentlessly attacked by some unidentified force and we’re reeling, without much to seemingly stand on.

Our planet’s resources are being polluted faster than we can identify. Everything in every sphere we just years ago held dear and tried to naturally defend has been so drastically altered it’s beyond identification or comprehension.

And we scream as if in a nightmare with no one listening.

Environmental Murder

The Gulf of Mexico and virtually the entire Pacific ocean have been virtually killed. Murdered.

The skies are being poisoned to an incredible degree, killing our plants, animals and fellow humans. Our food and water are horrendously modified. I like to believe in life’s regenerative processes, but we’re talking long term if this doesn’t stop soon.

Perhaps long after our kids and grand kids have then had to endure the horrors of a mutated world, if they live that long.
 

These frackers are playing for keeps. And people had better wake up to that fact.

These earth changes, and so-called scientific and social changes that are obviously engineered, clearly have an agenda.
 

What Agenda Might this Be?

Some Questions to Consider:

• WHY would the elites dig a super underground vault to store seeds from all over the planet while introducing genetically modified seeds growing food they themselves won’t touch?
  
  
• WHY have they built secret underground bases? - that aren’t so secret if you poke around a bit.
  
  
• WHY is the world not told a single fact about the Fukushima radiation readings, and the EPA monitors getting shut off and standards recalibrated?… while the media black out continues?
  
  
• WHY is questioning water fluoridation considered cult science while multiple millions drink the toxic industrial byproduct yet European countries throw the process off?
  
  
• WHY are they pushing vaccines so hard when they’ve been proven to maim children and adults?
  
  
• WHY is cellphone and other EMF technology deliberately set at the range of our brain frequency when it could have been outside that?
  
  
• WHY is the banking system getting off scot free when everyone knows they engineered this economic mess?
   

• WHY is war on terror so accepted when it was based on a staged false premise - a clearly government induced false flag millions identify?
   
• WHY is the education system spewing out dumber and dumber kids while more money is poured in to this endeavor?
   
• WHY is everyone so freakishly fat they can’t see their feet anymore and are suffering accelerated off the charts health challenges?
   
• WHY has questioning anything become a terrorist threat?
   
• WHY is our atmosphere so purposely filled with aluminum and other toxic substances our respiratory illnesses have skyrocketed, never mind other complications like increased seizures, memory loss, and even Alzheimers?
   
• WHY is going through the airport now a radioactive exam and terrorizing experience for even children and the elderly?
   
• WHY is the government now allowed to arrest, imprison and even kill you without trial?... as well as spy on you at will?
   
• WHY is the media swill the same on every channel with literally no independent reporting or investigative journalism?
   
• WHY is our DNA being tracked, our irises scanned, blood tested and our movements monitored?
   
• And why militarize American streets and authorize police and military brutality in crass overkill operations?

...etc. etc. etc...
 

Getting the picture?

We have to wake the hell up, is all I can say. If you don’t get it yet, I pity you.

We’re under attack. There’s a lot to be angry about. And if you’re not angry, you’re not alive. Then turn your anger into activity. Do something! Wake others up!

And most of all, drastically change your own life to reflect what you now know!

Are Individuals The Property of The Collective?

by Brandon Smith

 

 

Mankind has faced a bewildering multitude of self-made catastrophes and self-made terrors over the past few millennium, most of which stem from a single solitary conflict between two opposing social qualities:

individualism vs. collectivism.

These two forces of organizational mechanics have gone through evolution after evolution over the years, and I believe the long battle is nearing an apex moment; a moment in which one ideology or the other will become dominant around the world for well beyond the foreseeable future.

The assumption often made amongst academia is that the philosophy that appeals most to our “natural survival imperative” and caters to our desire for innovation will eventually win the day. That there is no “right or wrong” side; only the effective, and the less effective. The advanced and the outmoded. The transcendent, and the archaic.

It should come as no surprise then that most academics and prominent mainstream talking heads often sing the praises of collectivism as the inevitable champion in the war between cultural engines.

 

Collectivism always presents itself with the flair and sexiness of the “new”, or the progressive, while individualism tends to wear the unpleasant battle scars of hard earned principles and heritage.

 

Collectivism is the hot looking but mentally unstable bombshell blonde making promises of excitement and long term comfort she has no intention of keeping. She is so seductive not because she has any profound inner qualities, but because she has a knack for letting you believe she is exactly what you fantasize her to be.

 

Only when it’s too late do you realize she’s a psychopathic pill popping man-eater…

Collectivism is, in fact, a bastardization of a more useful human condition; namely community. Inherent in all people is the need for meaningful connection with others, and thus, the world around them, without being forced to sacrifice their own identities and their own souls in the process.

 

The best representation of this model is the idea of “voluntary community”, where individuals seek out each other and facilitate their own connections. However, if they can’t find meaningful connection, many people will settle for whatever they can get.

Collectivist structures thrive by shutting down free cultural avenues, manipulating public media, encouraging fear, repression, and bias, and destroying our ability to relate to others in a natural and voluntary way.

 

Collectivism’s first goal is to distract and ISOLATE individuals from one another, so that honest community is difficult to build. Its second goal is to then offer a false community; a cardboard cutout or proxy that entices the public with fabricated and superficial connections that barely satiate our inner hunger for relationship with our fellow man (Facebook, anyone?).

 

It uses our thirst for understanding against us, and lures us into a system of psychological enslavement where no understanding will ever be found.

Karl Marx is famous for stating that “religion is the opium of the people”, a belief that communists like Mao Zedong adopted. But, Mao was not opposed to “opiates for the masses” per se, only citizen organizations that could not be control. Mao simply replaced the various deities of the Chinese people with the religion of the collectivist state.

Like any opiate, collectivism instills addiction.

 

The feeling of belonging to something bigger than oneself (even if it ends up being false) creates ecstatic euphoria, a euphoria that weakens as time passes unless the addict commits himself even deeper into the hive mind. Soon, every original aspect of the person’s character is forgotten and replaced entirely by his hyper-obsession with the collective.

 

The whole of his identity becomes a shallow product of the state and he may even defend that state, no matter how corrupt, to the death. He now treats any criticism of the system as a personal attack on himself, because everything he is has been given to him by the collective.

 

If the collective is a sham, then so is he.

Collectivism as a philosophy is a perfect tool for oligarchy. The men who dominate such systems rarely if ever actually believe in the tenets they espouse. They sell the idea of single-minded society as a nurturing light that will create group supremacy, prosperity, and perfect safety.

 

But the truth is, they couldn’t care less about accomplishing any of these things for the masses. They are only interested in exploiting the promise to galvanize the population into a fraudulent community, a dystopia in which the citizens police each other in the name of the state, giving the elites total dominance.

The most vital aspect of the collectivist process is convincing the public that the individual citizen is not sovereign, but is actually the property of the group

False Flag Operations

The Crisis Route to the New World Order…
 

David Rockefeller said,

“All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”

Rahm Emanuel said,

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

In the Project for a New American Century document Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century we find the following:

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor.” ^[1]

False Flag (choreographed catastrophes) operations have been used for generations for various motives:

• the seizure of additional land and/or natural/mineral resources (domestic or foreign)
• the acquisition of cheap labor
• economic destabilization
• the military depopulation of indigenous populations
• the destruction of religious or political ideologies
• the establishment of political tyranny or a coup d'état (as experienced after 9/11with the establishment of the PATRIOT Act and the Department of Homeland Security)
• to assist an allegedly threatened ally
• to protect U.S. citizens living in a foreign country

The foundational factor in the majority of all false flag operations is the imposition of greater restrictions on worldwide residential populations in order to implement internationalism or globalism, formerly known as the utopian New World Order under the direction of an elite hierarchy.

False flag catastrophes include,

• terrorist attacks
• assassinations of political leaders
• “natural” disasters
• industrial “accidents”
• armed assaults against citizens (Waco, Ruby Ridge, Kent State)
• economic assaults in the form of economic crashes like 1929 or more recently the banker bailouts, both massive redistribution scams

The prevailing feature in all of these circumstances, whether manmade or “natural,” is the transference of culpability followed by the government’s predictable exploitation of any and all circumstances.

False flag operations manipulate individuals, either dupes or well-paid, skilled operatives - who masquerade as purported enemy aggressors. Aircraft or ships are either camouflaged to conceal their identity or marked in such a way as to confuse witnesses. The operation is compartmentally constructed in such a way that individuals participate in a small part of the venture without knowing the entire scope of the operation.

After the fact, their willing but unwary participation might insure their silence.

False flag operations accelerated after the formation of government intelligence agencies, like the CIA, again at the behest of private interests with the ready assistance of the media who introduce false leads to sustain the preconceived cover story.

A false flag operation where innocent people are murdered invariably supplies the pretext for a military invasion where even more killing occurs including unwary U.S. soldiers who believe they are fighting for their country.

Ambrose Pierce, the satirist, and creator of The Devil’s Dictionary defined politics as,

“A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles, the conduct of public affairs for private advantage.” ^[2]

---

• On January 24, 1898, during a Cuban insurrection against Spain, the USS Maine arrived at Havana, where it had been sent to allegedly protect some U.S. citizens living there.
  
  
  In reality, U.S. corporations, with about $50 million invested in the production and distribution of Cuban sugar and tobacco, had concerns about their investments. On February 15, 1898, while it was docked in Havana Harbor, a devastating explosion sank the ship. The incident killed 260 Americans. We now know that is was an internal explosion, not the result of an attack.
  
  
  However, the citizens were fueled by warmongers in the print media who pushed the slogan, “Remember the Maine! To hell with Spain.”
  
  
  Outraged citizens agreed to retaliate and go to war against Spain because of the incident. Congress, which was wholly controlled by private interests, declared war on April 25, 1898. Two days later, the U.S. sent 11,000 occupational troops to the resource-rich Philippines, a Spanish colony and the real target.
  
  
  The Filipinos resisted America’s “liberation” efforts for three years during which several thousand civilians were slaughtered.
  
  
  The strategic location of the Philippines would provide easier access to the riches of Asia, a highly populated area replete with abundant resources and almost numberless people who had been hoarding and passing down their gold and treasures for centuries.
  
  With the deceptive establishment of the privately owned Federal Reserve printing press by a compromised Congress, large-scale, debt-based warfare became even more feasible, its costs being shifted to U.S. citizens and their children and grandchildren.
  
  
  
  
• World War I in Europe was initially provoked by the assassination of an Austrian Archduke. But that was hardly an interest to Americans who had to feel some sense of personal outrage in order to justify U.S. military participation in a foreign war where American soldiers were likely to be killed. The Lusitania, an armed British passenger vessel deceptively flew the American flag and carried ammunition from U.S. companies bound for belligerent Britain.
  
  
  The ship, described as “live bait” by Winston Churchill, a Rothschild minion, was deliberately sent into harm’s way. Her military escort inexplicably withdrew and the ship dramatically slowed down and abandoned the defensive zigzag pattern of travel. In early February 1915, the British Admiralty, under the direction of Churchill, had ordered British merchant ships, like the Lusitania, to ram German submarines on sight.
  
  
  The Lusitania, borrowed by the British government and reclassified as an auxiliary cruiser, was equipped with bases for mounting guns. ^[3]
  
  
  Germany was aware of Churchill’s orders by February 15. On April 22, 1915, Germany, through its U.S. Embassy warned Americans not to travel on British ships in the war zone. They also paid to advertise the warning in The New York Times on that same day. ^[4]
  
  
  The warning was not printed in the Times until the day of departure. The Germans predictably attacked on May 7, 1915 and 785 people, including 128 Americans perished, but it ultimately got the U.S. into World War I.
  
  Lenin said,

  “The first World War gave us Russia, while the Second World War will hand Europe to us.” ^[5]

  For Lenin, a true Marxist, world revolution was the goal. 
  
  READ MORE....

Governments ADMIT that They Carry Out False Flag Terror

Forget the claims and allegations that false flag terror - governments attacking people and then blaming others in order to create animosity towards those blamed - has been used throughout history.

This essay will solely discuss government admissions to the use of false flag terror.

For example:

• A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that - under orders from the chief of the Gestapo - he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.

  
  

  Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson
  
   

• The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950's to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister
  
   

• Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind "evidence" implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this)
  
   

• The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.

  
  

  As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated:

  • "You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security" (and see this)

  (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred)
  
   

• As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba.

  
  

  See,

  • the following ABC news report

  • the official documents

  • watch below video interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings:

  
  

(While the Joint Chiefs of Staff pushed as a serious proposal for Operation Northwoods to be carried out, cooler heads fortunately prevailed; President Kennedy or his Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara apparently vetoed the plan) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him "to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident", thus framing the ANC for the bombing An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author) Former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Hugh Shelton says that a Clinton cabinet member proposed letting Saddam kill an American pilot as a pretext for war in Iraq (and see this) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization. The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the "war on terror". Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.” United Press International reported in June 2005: U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance. Official State Department documents show that - only nine months before - the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. (While the Joint Chiefs of Staff pushed as a serious proposal for Operation Northwoods to be carried out, cooler heads fortunately prevailed; President Kennedy or his Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara apparently vetoed the plan) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him "to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident", thus framing the ANC for the bombing An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author) Former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Hugh Shelton says that a Clinton cabinet member proposed letting Saddam kill an American pilot as a pretext for war in Iraq (and see this) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization. The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the "war on terror". Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.” United Press International reported in June 2005: U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.